Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (f7022f0) 82.64% compared to head (9573375) 82.71%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #494      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.64%   82.71%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          51       51              
  Lines        2823     2823              
  Branches      312      312              
==========================================
+ Hits         2333     2335       +2     
+ Misses        366      365       -1     
+ Partials      124      123       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@chmorgan could you review this? the coverage change seems to be sporadic due to https://github.com/dotpcap/sharppcap/blob/master/SharpPcap/WinDivert/WinDivertDevice.cs#L140-L154 block having the lines covered change depending on packet count/buffer size.

@kayoub5 oh and no idea on the coverage issue. Surprised we'd get different results on different runs but maybe we have some tests that use random data without using a fixed random number seed.

Overview of this looks good to me. Did you generate this by hand or some application that went through git history to update it?

For license I used a reuse-tool to inject the MIT header.
For copyright I checked files history manually, then used reuse-tool to make sure no file is missing copyright header (even added CI job for it), I didn't double check files that already had a copyright header.